Comment: No Right to Secret Campaign Gifts

FREE SPEECH — A post on the Lincoln News Messenger blog attacks the argument that disclosing financial contributions to state ballot measures like Proposition 8 improperly invades the donors' privacy and speech rights.

The argument is as pernicious as it is disingenuous.
    It holds that mandatory campaign finance disclosure laws limit freedom of speech and of political action and that anonymous donations have traditionally protected groups, like the NAACP (they from government harassment, not from public accountability, which the columnists neatly ignore), and that public pressure to disclose donors who choose to not remain anonymous will accomplish what regulations already provide (yeah, right).
    This is not just another wingnut attempt to protect wealthy corporate milch-cows. It's a full-tilt attempt to undermine California's campaign finance disclosure laws.
Advertisements

Nail Salons Frequently Cited for Health Hazards

PUBLIC RECORDS REVEAL . . . that while San Diego County is home to about 3,640 salons—five times the number of local gas stations.—from exclusive spas to discount shops, many are putting customers at risk, according to a San Diego Union-Tribune analysis.

Between July 2003 and June 2008, inspectors cited more than half the local salons for at least one health violation and fined them a total of $1.35 million. The most common problems were failing to throw away dirty items and not storing disinfected tools in clean, covered and labeled containers.
    There is nothing that says how often salons must be inspected, and many go without scrutiny for years.
    The state's Board of Barbering and Cosmetology currently employs 22 inspectors, who are responsible for scrutinizing 44,921 establishments statewide. That's about one inspector for every 2,000 establishments.

Lab-Tainted DNA May Incriminate Innocents

PUBLIC RECORDS REVEAL . . . That DNA testing in criminal labs is not foolproof and may incriminiate the innocent, reports the Los Angeles Times.

Through the California Public Records Act, the (Los Angeles) Times obtained documents from five state-run and three county forensic labs reporting scores of laboratory errors or "unexpected" results over a five-year period ending in 2007. Labs must track these outcomes and keep them on file under state and federal rules.
    (An expert) who reviewed the records for The Times, said that "on a regular basis, laboratory personnel make mistakes that could lead to false identifications" of suspects.
    The records show, for instance, that between 2003 and 2007, the Santa Clara County district attorney's crime laboratory caught 14 instances in which evidence samples were contaminated with staff members' DNA, three in which samples were contaminated by an unknown person and six in which DNA from one case contaminated samples from another.

Column Access a Reportable Campaign Gift?

FREE PRESS — You're a local newspaper columnist who runs for city council and wins.  Was your free access to the press during the campaign a reportable campaign contribution? According to a report in the Vacaville Reporter, somebody thinks so.

Although the election is over for the Dixon City Council, some allegedly questionable campaign practices have risen to the surface in a recent complaint to the state Fair Political Practices Commission.
Former Councilman Mike Smith filed the complaint Dec. 17 against newly elected-Councilman Michael Ceremello, former Councilman Steve Alexander and former mayoral candidate Dave Scholl.
    The Reporter has not received official documentation of the complaint, but Smith explained that the complaint has a lot do with writing and campaign ads that ran in the Independent Voice, a local newspaper owned by Scholl.
    Ceremello is also a regular contributor to the articles and columns published in the newspaper.
    "It makes it very hard to run a fair campaign when a paper, that is distributed to everyone, is biased," Smith said.

A.G. Appeals Sought on Cable Access Sunset

FREE PRESS — Jayne Lyn Stahl writes in Huffington Post that, with respect to a plan by Time Warner Cable to shut fourteen public access cable TV studios in Los Angeles two days from now,

The response from those who abhor monopolies, and the ability of media conglomerates to strongarm the community must be swift, and decisive. Whether you live in Santa Monica, New York City, Boston, or Des Moines, Iowa, should Time Warner prevail on December 31st, what happens in Los Angeles will affect you.
    Those who share this concern for protecting the integrity of the First Amendment, independent programming, and preventing a media shark from swallowing all the little fish, must act quickly by contacting California Attorney General Brown at: agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov, and urging him to seek injunctive relief under the California Business and Professions Code 17200, Section 3, Unfair Business Practices.

See previous post.  Leslie Dutton, whose Full Disclosure program would be ended with the shutdown, comments:

It is important to note that the DIVCA legislation enacted in 2007 provides for the Cable Franichise Fees to continue to flow to the Cities. In Los Angeles that is estimated at $25 million. With DIVCA now shifting the responsibilities for providing the public access studio/channel system to the Cities, there is an additional 2% or $5 million to be made available for such a purpose. The City of Los Angeles has approved an option that does not provide for even a single designated channel for public access. With the loss of 14 public access studios and channels this December 31st, the City's intent becomes clear, the fees paid by the cable subscribers in their monthly bills will go to the general fund and not for public access, thus silencing the public.

OPEN MEETINGS — Two remarkable things about this story in Plumas County News: the protracted discussion by the county board of supervisors, entirely in open session, of how much the contract county counsel was being paid as a retainer, and the services that retainer did not cover and thus were being billed separately; and the fact that part of the story could have appeared as a music review.

As if on cue, just as tension was rising in the boardroom, Johnny McDonald’s High Sierra Youth Orchestra broke into a stirring rendition of Johann Sebastian Bach’s “Double Violin Concerto” downstairs in the courthouse foyer. The orchestra performs an annual concert in the courthouse during the holiday season.
    Cota was beginning to explain a matter involving the Moonlight Fire that Meacher felt didn’t fit into the “complex litigation” category. He said the firm had to work through the weekend on short notice to prepare for the Monday court appearance.
    “Then I beg you tell me what is covered under the retainer,” Meacher exclaimed as the music began to seep up the courthouse stairs and waft softly into the boardroom.

'Organic' Fertilizer Fakery Kept under Wraps

PUBLIC RECORDS REVEAL . . that, according to the Sacramento Bee, the California Department of Food and Agriculture took three years to act after first being tipped that the best selling "organic" fertilizer was actually spiked with ammonium sulfate.

State officials knew some of California's largest organic farms had been using the fertilizer, the documents show, but they kept their findings confidential until nearly a year and a half after it was removed from the market. No farms lost their organic certification.
    The nonprofit California Certified Organic Farmers, which certifies about 80 percent of the state's organic acreage, decided not to penalize farms that had used the product on the grounds that farmers did not know they were using an unapproved chemical.